Monitoring marine plastics – will we know if we are making a difference?

  • Peter G. Ryan FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, DST-NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3356-2056
  • Lorien Pichegru Institute for Coastal and Marine Research, Department of Zoology, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa
  • Vonica Perold FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, DST-NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape
  • Coleen L. Moloney Department of Biological Sciences and Marine Research Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
Keywords: adaptive management, marine debris surveys, bioindicators, turnover, upstream monitoring

Abstract

In the context of marine anthropogenic debris management, monitoring is essential to assess whether mitigation measures to reduce the amounts of waste plastic entering the environment are being effective. In South Africa, baselines against which changes can be assessed include data from the 1970s to the 1990s on microplastics floating at sea, on macro- and microplastic beach debris, and interactions with biota. However, detecting changes in the abundance of microplastics at sea is complicated by high spatial and temporal heterogeneity in net samples. Beach debris data are easier to gather, but their interpretation is complicated by the dynamic nature of debris fluxes on beaches and the increase in beach cleaning effort over time. Sampling plastic ingested by biota is a powerful approach, because animals that retain ingested plastic for protracted periods integrate plastics over space and time, but there are ethical issues to using biota as bioindicators, particularly for species that require destructive sampling (e.g. turtles, seabirds). Bioindicators could be established among fish and invertebrates, but there are technical challenges with sampling microplastics smaller than 1 mm. Fine-scale debris accumulation on beaches provides an index of macroplastic abundance in coastal waters, and offers a practical way to track changes in the amounts and composition of debris in coastal waters. However, upstream flux measures (i.e. in catchments, rivers and storm-water run-off) provide a more direct assessment of mitigation measures for land-based sources. Similarly, monitoring refuse returned to port by vessels is the best way to ensure compliance with legislation prohibiting the dumping of plastics at sea.

Significance:

  • Monitoring is required to assess whether mitigation measures to reduce waste plastics at sea are making a difference.
  • Monitoring the leakage of plastic from land-based sources is best addressed on land (e.g. in storm drains and river run-off) before the plastic reaches the sea.
  • Illegal dumping from ships is best addressed by monitoring the use of port waste reception facilities.
  • Sampling plastic ingested by biota is a powerful approach, using fish and invertebrates as bioindicators for larger microplastic fragments.
Views
  • Abstract 553
  • PDF 244
  • EPUB 33
  • XML 96
  • Supplementary Material 21
Views and downloads are with effect from 11 January 2018
Published
2020-05-27
Section
Marine Plastic Debris: Review Article